Donlon Bros. v. Indus. Accident Comm'n of Cal.
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Certiorari to review an award of the Industrial Accident Commission of the State of California. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Bradner W. Lee, Bradner W. Lee, Jr., and Kenyon F. Lee, for Petitioners.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Review of an award of the Industrial Accident Commission. The admitted facts disclose that petitioners, Donlon Brothers, a copartnership, contracted with K. Kataoka, agreeing to pay him $4.50 a cord for firewood which he was to cut from a row of eucalyptus trees growing on the tract of land owned by the Donlon Brothers. Kataoka, a Japanese, contemplated having the contract performed by Japanese labor. Unable to procure it, he contracted with Angel Garcia for the doing of the same work, agreeing to pay Angel Garcia at the rate of $4.25 a cord. Thereafter Angel Garcia in turn contracted with…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Great Western Power Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Carstens v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
3Cited by16 opinions
- Riskin v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Flickenger v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Packett v. Moretown Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1917
- Thaxter v. FinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. BrushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.