Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Brush
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Review to annul an award of the Industrial Accident Commission. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
A writ of certiorari was issued, directed to the Industrial Accident Commission, for the purpose of reviewing an award of compensation to Martin A. Brush, a laborer injured while cutting wood on the premises of the Bound Valley Land Company.
The father of the applicant, one Seymour Brush, had made an agreement with the superintendent of the Land Company’s property to cut sixty to eighty cords of wood, or as much as would be required for the use of the company in its Mins for the ensuing year. By the terms of this arrangement Seymour Brush was to be paid $1.75 a cord for firewood and six cents…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Fink v. Missouri Furnace Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- Donlon Bros. v. Indus. Accident Comm'n of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1916
3Cited by14 opinions
- Riskin v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Flickenger v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Matter of Litts v. . Risley Lumber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Roman Catholic Archbishop v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Pryor v. Indus. Accident Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.