Legal Opinion

In Re Brooks

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided February 24, 2004No. 19-50440PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF

MARILYN SHEA-STONUM, Bankruptcy Judge.

On December 29, 2003, the Movant, Ford Credit Titling Trust, through its counsel Javitch, Block and Rathbone (“Javitch”) filed a Motion for Relief from Stay (the “Motion for Relief’) which was deficient because the attached exhibit that was identified as the Lease Agreement for an item in which the estate had an interest, a 2001 Ford Explorer, was unsigned. On Motions for Relief from Stay, the Fed. R. Bankr.P. and the local rules are intended to, inter alia, assist movants in…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re MartinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2006
  2. In Re WhiteUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2009
  3. In Re SzymanskiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2006
  4. In Re CrossUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API