Legal Opinion

Blum v. Smith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1911No. 9670PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment, of the superior court for King county, Dykeman, J., entered April M, 1911, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action for. rescission and. cancellation, after a trial before the court without a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

The respondents brought this action to rescind a contract for an exchange of real estate for a lease and the furniture of an apartment house in the city of Seattle, and *193to set aside a deed of certain real estate, made by them to the appellants, on the ground of fraud and deceit claimed to have been practiced by the appellants to induce the exchange, and also on the ground of alleged failure of the appellants to perform the contract on their part. The cause was tried to the court without a jury. From a decree rescinding the contract and setting aside the deed, the defendants have appealed.

The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wooddy v. Benton Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. City of Tacoma v. Tacoma Light & Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Best v. OffieldWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Stone v. MoodyWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  5. McMillen v. HillmanWashington Supreme Court · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Marston v. RueWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Gray v. ReevesWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Stanton v. ZercherWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Champneys v. IrwinWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Boehme v. Broadway Theater Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API