State v. Suggs
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStephan, J.
The State of Nebraska appeals from an order of the district court for Douglas County sustaining Michael D. Suggs’ motion for postconviction relief. The district court found that Suggs received per se ineffective assistance of counsel because his trial attorney, Charles M. Radosevich, had previously been disbarred in Colorado and had subsequently concealed this fact when moving for reinstatement of his license to practice law in Nebraska, which had lapsed because of nonpayment of dues. In State v. McCroy, ante p. 709, 613 N.W.2d 1 (2000), released today, we considered another postconviction…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Holste v. Burlington Northern RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. RyanNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- Hagelstein v. Swift-Eckrich Division of ConAgraNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. PalmerNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- State v. MolinaNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. HessNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. MarshallNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. CaddyNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.