Hagelstein v. Swift-Eckrich Division of ConAgra
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGerrard, J.
NATURE OF CASE
Dale E. Hagelstein appeals from the Workers’ Compensation Court’s denial of his petition seeking total disability benefits or, in the alternative, vocational retraining. The initial question presented to this court is whether a review panel of the Workers’ Compensation Court is properly constituted when only two judges participate in the decision. Because we conclude that it is not and that as a consequence we lack appellate jurisdiction, we dismiss Hagelstein’s appeal and remand the cause for further proceedings.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Hagelstein was injured on January 28, 1991,…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Ogden v. Dickinson State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- United States v. Alberto Hernandez-FundoraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Charles Eldon Gould, United States of America v. Joseph Patrick CareyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- State v. SilversNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- Gottsch v. Bank of StapletonNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Stenberg v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- Strunk v. Chromy-StrunkNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- Ferguson v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- Creighton St. Joseph Regional Hospital v. Nebraska Tax Equalization & Review CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- Miller v. E.M.C. Insurance CompaniesNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.