Legal Opinion

C. Sadler v. WCAB (Philadelphia Coca-Cola)

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 22, 2019No. 328 C.D. 2018PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY JUDGE COHN JUBELIRER

Carl Sadler (Claimant) petitions for review of the February 16, 2018 Order of the Workers' Compensation (WC) Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed, as modified, the Decision of the Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ). The WCJ denied in part Claimant's Petition to Review WC Benefits (Review Petition) because Claimant failed to establish that his average weekly wage (AWW) was incorrectly calculated, and granted Philadelphia Coca-Cola's (Employer) Petition to Suspend WC Benefits (Suspension Petition) for 525 days on the basis that Claimant, under Section 306(a.1) of the…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Golden Gate Nat'l Senior Care LLCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Hannaberry HVAC v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Minicozzi v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Penflex, Inc. v. BrysonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. TruesdaleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. C. Sadler v. Philadelphia Coca-Cola (WCAB)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  2. HUF Restaurant, Inc. v. Com. of PACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  3. Sadler, C. v. WCAB (Apl of: Phila Coca-Cola Co.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API