Legal Opinion

Beseau v. George

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 19, 1952No. Civ. 18855PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals from an order granting a new trial after she had won a verdict and judgment of $15,000 for injuries suffered in a collision of two automobiles. The motion was granted upon the sole ground of insufficiency of the evidence.

The collision occurred in the intersection of Third Avenue, a north and south street, and Venice Boulevard, an east and west street. Tracks of the Pacific Blectric Railway are located in its right of way on Venice Boulevard. The right of way is 34 feet wide, the portion of the boulevard north of the right of way is 28 feet wide, and the portion south of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brooks v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Ballard v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Williams v. Field Transportation Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Tice v. Kaiser Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Jones v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Davenport v. WaiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Koenig v. CoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Climo v. LampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API