Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Perez

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 21, 2002PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSosman, J.

The present appeal requires us to determine the appropriate unit of prosecution for the crime of being an accessory after the fact. G. L. c. 274, § 4. The defendant was convicted on two indictments charging him with being an accessory after the fact to assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon, based on his assistance to two perpetrators of a drive-by shooting in which two victims were wounded. On *187appeal, the defendant contends that the convictions, based on a single course of conduct assisting the perpetrators, are duplicative and therefore violate the prohibition against double…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DonovanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. LeviaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. HolidayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  4. Commonwealth v. MeltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  5. Commonwealth v. DevlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. MarreroMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
  4. Commonwealth v. Hoshi H.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
  5. Commonwealth v. RiveraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API