Legal Opinion

Hoopla Sports & Entertainment, Inc. v. Nike, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided November 19, 1996No. 96 C 1642PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CASTILLO, District Judge.

Plaintiff Hoopla Sports and Entertainment, Inc. sues defendants Nike, Inc. and Columbia Broadcasting Systems (“CBS”), claiming that they wrongfully usurped his creation, a “U.S. versus the world” basketball game involving all-star teams of high school age boys. Hoopla seeks $2,000,000 in compensatory damages and punitive damages for trademark infringement, copyright infringement, breach of contract, intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, violations of the Illinois Deceptive Business Practices Act, and fraud. The…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Emil J. Bartholet v. Reishauer A.G. (Zurich) and Reishauer Corporation (Elgin)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  4. San Francisco Arts & Athletics, Inc. v. United States Olympic CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Mavourneen Doherty v. City of Chicago, Graham C. Grady, Judith C. RiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Krasner v. MoffettSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
  2. Slep-Tone Entertainment Corp. v. Kalamata, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
  3. Intervisual Communications, Inc. v. VolkertDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
  4. F. McConnell & Sons, Inc. v. Target Data Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1999
  5. Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. v. Titan Tire Corp.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API