Legal Opinion
Mavourneen Doherty v. City of Chicago, Graham C. Grady, Judith C. Rice
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 28, 1996No. 95-1297PublishedCited by 294 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
In her amended complaint, Mavourneen Doherty, a provider of space to charities for bingo games, alleges that the defendants conspired to violate her rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. Specifically, she alleges that the defendants improperly required her to obtain a Public Place of Amusement (PPA) license for one bingo hall and denied her zoning certification for another. The district court dismissed the amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For the reasons set forth in the following opinion, we affirm the judgment of the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by294 opinions
- Michael C. Antonelli v. Michael F. SheahanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- General Electric Capital Corporation v. Lease Resolution CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Donald McCormick v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Mark A. Lee v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Karl F. Wudtke and Hope C. Wudtke v. Frederick J. DavelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
289 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.