Legal Opinion

Krasner v. Moffett

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided June 18, 2003No. 569,2002PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VEASEY, Chief Justice:

In this appeal, we address the question whether a stockholder class action can be dismissed under Chancery Rule 12(b)(6) where the complaint adequately alleges that a majority of the directors recommending a merger to the stockholders had disabling conflicts of interest. The Court of Chancery determined that the complaint alleges facts sufficient to infer that five of the seven directors on the board were interested in the merger. The merger had been negotiated and recommended by a special committee of the two arguably independent directors who voted with the full board…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  3. Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  4. Malpiede v. TownsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  5. Regina (Rega) Jablon v. Dean Witter & Co., and Sydney TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In re Trados Inc. Shareholder LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
  2. Quadrant Structured Products Company, Ltd. v. VertinCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2014
  3. Chen v. Howard-AndersonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2014
  4. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Verestar, Inc. v. American Tower Corp. (In Re Verestar, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  5. In Re Cysive, Inc. Shareholders LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API