Legal Opinion
Jordan v. Buick Motor Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 4, 1935No. 5190PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EVANS, Circuit Judge.
The complaint in substance alleges that two agents of Buick Motor Company, with authority to so speak, represented to appellants (and appellee Hansen) 'that if $40,000 more capital were secured for the E. M. Jordan Buick Company, it would be granted an exclusive agency to sell and service Buick cars in the county of Milwaukee and would be given the use of a Buick showroom located in Milwaukee. Appellants contributed the additional capital amounting to $40,000. For a short period Jordan Company was given the use of the showroom, but no exclusive agency was ever granted.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Geo. W. Wilcox, Inc. v. Shell Eastern Petroleum Products, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Oakland Motor Car Co. v. Indiana Automobile Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1912
- Ford Motor Co. v. Kirkmyer Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
- Nebraska Aircraft Corp. v. VarneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
- State v. RodmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Ellis v. KlaffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- General Motors Corp. v. Keener Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
- Buggs v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Grimm v. BaumgartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951
- Motor Car Supply Co. v. General Household Utilities Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.