Slindee v. City of St. Paul
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
Defendant appeals from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.
These are the facts: Plaintiff and her husband were occupying an apartment on the second floor of a building fronting on Holly avenue. Their only means of ingress and egress was the entrance on Holly avenue. At about 9:30 o’clock in the evening of March 8, 1943, plaintiff took her “little seven-year-old Scottie” dog out for •its customary evening “airing.” The husband worked on a night shift, and for that reason plaintiff alone took the dog out for its evening chore. All that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Steinbauer v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Campion v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Erd v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
3Cited by10 opinions
- Peterson v. WT Rawleigh CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Donald v. MosesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Strong v. ShefvelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Squillace v. Village of Mountain IronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Muckler v. BuchlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.