Legal Opinion

Slindee v. City of St. Paul

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 23, 1945No. 33,931PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Defendant appeals from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.

These are the facts: Plaintiff and her husband were occupying an apartment on the second floor of a building fronting on Holly avenue. Their only means of ingress and egress was the entrance on Holly avenue. At about 9:30 o’clock in the evening of March 8, 1943, plaintiff took her “little seven-year-old Scottie” dog out for •its customary evening “airing.” The husband worked on a night shift, and for that reason plaintiff alone took the dog out for its evening chore. All that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Steinbauer v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  2. Campion v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  3. Erd v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Peterson v. WT Rawleigh CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. Donald v. MosesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. Strong v. ShefvelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  4. Squillace v. Village of Mountain IronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  5. Muckler v. BuchlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API