Routh v. CITY OF PARKVILLE, MISSOURI
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SACHS, District Judge.
This civil rights suit under 42 U..S.C. § 1983 was initially brought in state court and removed by defendants to this court. Plaintiff seeks a remand, asserting that he has been given an option to use the state courts and has the right to maintain his action there. State and federal courts have concurrent jurisdiction over § 1983 cases.
Several distinguished judges have followed the rule that “where Congress has provided for concurrent jurisdiction in state and federal courts, the claim may be asserted in either court and removal on the basis of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Avco Corp. v. Aero Lodge No. 735, International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Johnson v. Butler Bros.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
- Salveson v. Western States Bankcard Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1981
- Colin K. v. SchmidtDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1981
- McConnell v. Marine Engineers Beneficial Ass'n Benefit Plans, District 1District Court, N.D. California · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Robert H. Dorsey v. The City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- California Republican Party v. MercierDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1986
- Gleichauf v. GinsbergDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1994
- Aben v. DallwigDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1987
- Fayetteville Perry Local School District v. Reckers Ex Rel. ReckersDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.