Legal Opinion
Gleichauf v. Ginsberg
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided August 1, 1994No. Civ. A. 3:94-0481PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HADEN, Chief Judge.
Pending are Plaintiffs’ motions to remand and re-seal this action and Defendants’ motion for more definite statement. Defendants have responded to the motions to remand and re-seal, and Plaintiffs have replied. Plaintiffs have not responded to the motion for a more definite statement. 1 These matters are now ripe for adjudication. 2
On April 13, 1994 Plaintiffs’ filed their complaint in the Circuit Court of Cabell County, West Virginia. The complaint was served upon the Defendants on May 16,1994. The complaint is framed in motion form and is…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Howlett Ex Rel. Howlett v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tilley v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1999
- Burgess v. Gateway Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1997
- Callison v. Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1995
- Matter of Rimsat, Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1998
- Cheney v. StudstrupDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.