Legal Opinion
Huber v. Henley
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided March 20, 1987No. NA 86-112-CPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY
BARKER, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the motion of one of the defendants, National Starch and Chemical Corporation (“National Starch”), for leave to file an amended answer. For the reasons set forth below, leave to amend is GRANTED.
Memorandum
Background of Lawsuit
On April 30, 1986, the plaintiff, Dean L. Huber, filed his complaint against National Starch and four other defendants for injuries he sustained in a highway accident that occurred on December 3, 1985. National Starch, after receiving one enlargement of time, filed its answer and a cross-claim on June 19,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Foster v. PearcyIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
- Livingston v. Consolidated City of IndianapolisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
3Cited by10 opinions
- Indiana Department of Insurance v. EverhartIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
- Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1987
- Handrow v. CoxIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Rockrohr v. Norfolk Southern Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1992
- Mills v. Hausmann-McNally, S.C.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.