Legal Opinion
Mills v. Hausmann-McNally, S.C.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided September 24, 2014No. 1:13-cv-00044-SEB-DKLPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SARAH EVANS BARKER, District Judge.
This cause is before the Court on two motions for summary judgment: Plaintiff William Mills’s Motion for Partial Sum-*1130raary Judgment on Defendant’s first affirmative defense [Docket No. 44], filed on September 19, 2013, and Defendant Haus-mann-McNally, S.C.’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Docket No. 62], filed on December 9, 2013. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs motion is GRANTED and Defendant’s motion is DENIED.
Facts 1
These motions for summary judgment arise out of a legal malpractice action, which in turn arises out of a personal injury…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sandra L. Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Christopher J. Michas v. Health Cost Controls of Illinois, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Coleman v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- City of Columbus v. Debra A. Londeree and Dan LondereeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2020
- Coleman v. Trustees of Purdue UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Open Book Theatre Company v. Brown Paper Tickets, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024