Foster v. Pearcy
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GIVAN, Chief Justice.
Appellant filed this cause of action for libel against Leroy New and appellee Noble Pearcy. Pearcy moved to dismiss under TR 12(B)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The trial court granted the motion. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that Pearcy as Prosecuting Attorney enjoyed only a qualified immunity for statements made to the press by him and his deputy Leroy New. Foster v. Pearcy (1978), Ind.App., 376 N.E.2d 1205. We grant transfer and reinstate the judgment of the trial court.
In 1974 Pearcy was Marion County Prosecuting…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Griffith v. SlinkardIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Wallace v. FeehanIndiana Supreme Court · 1934
- Boaz v. TateIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Hartsock v. ReddickIndiana Supreme Court · 1842
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Celebration Fireworks, Inc. v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Cantrell v. MorrisIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Michael L. Davis v. John ZirkelbachCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Quakenbush v. LackeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Knapper v. ConnickSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.