Legal Opinion
Mau v. L.A. Fitness International, LLC
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 10, 2010No. 10 C 1411PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MILTON I. SHADUR, Senior District Judge.
Jay Mau (“Mau”), individually and as the proposed representative of a putative class, has filed a six-count complaint against L.A. Fitness International, LLC. (“Fitness”), claiming that Fitness wrongfully imposed a uniform early termination fee provision on its clients under its fitness services agreements (“Agreements”) in violation of Illinois law. Fitness has moved for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 56, and the motion has been fully briefed. For the reasons stated here, Fitness’ motion is denied and its…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wheeler v. LawsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. American Family Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Ronald Lesch v. Crown Cork & Seal Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Minnick v. CLEARWIRE US LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State of Indiana, acting on behalf of the Indiana Family & Social Services Administration v. International Business Machines CorporationIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Minnick v. CLEARWIRE US LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- Minnick v. CLEARWIRE US LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State of Indiana, acting on behalf of the Indiana Family & Social Services Administration v. International Business Machines CorporationIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014