Minnick v. CLEARWIRE US LLC
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*446Owens, J.
¶1 The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit certified the following question:
Does Washington law treat the [early termination fee] at issue in this case as an alternative performance provision, or as a liquidated damages clause?
Minnick v. Clearwire US LLC, 636 F.3d 534, 538 (9th Cir. 2011) (hereinafter Order). This question is important because a liquidated damages provision is subject to a penalty analysis that an alternative performance provision avoids. The early termination fee (ETF) is a provision in a fixed-term telecommunications contract that charges customers…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 2003
- Walter Implement, Inc. v. FochtWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Schwan-Stabilo Cosmetics Gmbh & Co. v. Pacificlink International Corporation and Paul Shieh, Docket No. 04-0645-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Broad v. Mannesmann Anlagenbau, A.G.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
- Chandler v. Doran Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Digital Ally, Inc. v. Z3 Technology, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Columbia Debt Recovery, Llc, V. Yemeserach GebreseralseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2022
- Hemlock Semiconductor Corp. v. Kyocera Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Minnick v. CLEARWIRE US LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- Nova Contracting, Inc. v. City Of OlympiaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.