Legal Opinion

Minnick v. CLEARWIRE US LLC

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 2012No. 85810-1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*446Owens, J.

¶1 The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit certified the following question:

Does Washington law treat the [early termination fee] at issue in this case as an alternative performance provision, or as a liquidated damages clause?

Minnick v. Clearwire US LLC, 636 F.3d 534, 538 (9th Cir. 2011) (hereinafter Order). This question is important because a liquidated damages provision is subject to a penalty analysis that an alternative performance provision avoids. The early termination fee (ETF) is a provision in a fixed-term telecommunications contract that charges customers…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Walter Implement, Inc. v. FochtWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Schwan-Stabilo Cosmetics Gmbh & Co. v. Pacificlink International Corporation and Paul Shieh, Docket No. 04-0645-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  4. Broad v. Mannesmann Anlagenbau, A.G.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Chandler v. Doran Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Digital Ally, Inc. v. Z3 Technology, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  2. Columbia Debt Recovery, Llc, V. Yemeserach GebreseralseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2022
  3. Hemlock Semiconductor Corp. v. Kyocera Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  4. Minnick v. CLEARWIRE US LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Nova Contracting, Inc. v. City Of OlympiaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API