Minnick v. CLEARWIRE US LLC
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentChambers, J.
¶34 (dissenting) — The fundamental difference between liquidated damages and an alternative performance provision is that an alternative performance is intended by the parties — both parties — to be a real choice, while a liquidated damages provision is meant to be a device to ensure performance. Clearwire’s contract is an adhesion contract “signed” on line by its customers clicking a “yes” button. Clearwire asks us to believe that the fee it imposes on those who want out of the contract (or who breach the contract) is not intended as a device to ensure *459performance. With all due respect to my…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Blank v. BordenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Chandler v. Doran Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
- Cellphone Termination Fee CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Bellevue School District No. 405 v. BentleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Mau v. L.A. Fitness International, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010