Legal Opinion

U.S. Realty 86 Associates v. Security Investment, Ltd.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 2002No. 20000450PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INTRODUCTION

HOWE, Chief Justice.

{1 Plaintiff U.S. Realty 86 Associates ("U.S.Realty") failed to timely exercise options to renew two commercial leases between itself and defendants Security Investment, Ltd., William L. Olson, and Barbara L. Olson (collectively "Security Investment"). U.S. Realty subsequently brought this action against Security Investment seeking a declaratory judgment that U.S. Realty was equitably excused from strict compliance with the renewal provisions of the leases, and that Security Investment had waived its right to receive timely notice under the leases. The trial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. F. B. Fountain Co. v. SteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  3. Soter's, Inc. v. Deseret Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Phoenix Ins. Co. v. HeathUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Geisdorf v. DoughtyUtah Supreme Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Andrews v. BlakeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Jau-Fei Chen v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  3. United Park City Mines Co. v. Stichting Mayflower Mountain FondsUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Cottonwood Improvement District v. Qwest Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  5. Bear v. Lifemap AssuranceCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API