Legal Opinion

Cottonwood Improvement District v. Qwest Corp.

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided January 25, 2013No. 20110954-CAPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Decision

VOROS, Judge:

T1 The question on appeal is whether Qwest Corporation (Qwest) is obligated to reimburse Cottonwood Improvement District (Cottonwood) $31,022.90 for the cost of removing a cable owned by Qwest from a sewer line owned by Cottonwood. At trial, Cottonwood proceeded on three theories: promissory estoppel, unjust enrichment, and violation of the Damage to Underground Utility Facilities Act. See Utah Code Ann. §§ 54-82a-2 to -18 (LexisNexis 2010). In keeping with the special verdicts returned by an advisory jury, the trial court granted judgment for Cottonwood on the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Jeffs v. StubbsUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Prows v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Fericks v. Lucy Ann Soffe TrustUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Andreason v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Thatcher v. LangCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  2. Volonte v. Domo, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2023
  3. Global Fitness Holdings, LLC v. Federal Recovery Acceptance, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 2015
  4. Co-Diagnostics v. Hukui TechnologyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2025
  5. In re Estate of BerreyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API