Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Clayton

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 23, 2005No. 04-P-445PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrasso, J.

In Commonwealth v. Clayton, 52 Mass. App. Ct. 198 (2001) (Clayton I), we reversed the defendant’s conviction on a single indictment of statutory rape that charged him with having “sexual intercourse or unnatural sexual intercourse” with a child at divers times from 1979 to 1987. Id. at 199. We reversed because we concluded that limitation of the defendant’s *609cross-examination of the complainant amounted to prejudicial error. Id. at 202-203. We also decided that the defendant was not denied due process of law in violation of art. 12 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights where the petit…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Commonwealth v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Peterson v. HopsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  5. Commonwealth v. ConefreyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tien Fu Hsu v. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. SullivanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
  3. Commonwealth v. RileyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
  4. Commonwealth v. ChildsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  5. Commonwealth v. DustinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API