Legal Opinion

Producers' & Refiners' Corp. v. Lehmann

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 25, 1927No. 7044PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, District Judge.

The Producers’ & Refiners’ Corporation has appealed from the decree of the court below, adjudging it an infringer of patent No. 1,223,659, issued April 24,1917, to William S. Bamickel, now deceased, and also from the judgment on the accounting for profits in the sum of $290,895.24 in favor of the administrators of said deceased.

The first contention of appellant to be considered is that the patent adjudged infringed is void for double patenting. On April 14, 1914, patent No. 1,093,098 was issued to said William S. Barniekel. It is alleged in the answer and claimed by…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Wagner Electric & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Keystone Manufacturing Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gotham Silk Hosiery Co. v. Artcraft Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
  2. Middleton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  3. Ruth v. Stearns-Roger Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1935
  4. International Industries, Inc. v. Warren Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
  5. Motor Player Corporation v. Piano Motors CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API