Legal Opinion
Motor Player Corporation v. Piano Motors Corporation
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 8, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RELLSTAB, District Judge.
The defendants were held to have infringed letters patent No. 1,320,224, covering1 a motor-driven suction-producing apparatus for a player piano, acquired by the plaintiff through mesne assignments from Garman, the patentee and eodefendant. 282 E. 435. While the interlocutory decree included both defendants, the accounting was pros'ecuted against only the defendant corporation. All further references herein to defendant indicate the corporation only.
This patented device, called Electora, and that of the defendant, named Motora, are complete devices, serving the same…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dowagiac Manufacturing Co. v. Minnesota Moline Plow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Rude v. WestcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- United States Frumentum Co. v. LauhoffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
- K. W. Ignition Co. v. Temco Electric Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
- Continuous Glass Press Co. v. Schmertz Wire Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Activated Sludge v. Sanitary Dist. of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1946
- Ruth v. Stearns-Roger Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1935
- Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co. v. LemanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1928
- Standard Brands, Inc. v. Federal Yeast Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1930
- John B. Stetson Co. v. Stephen L. Stetson Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.