Legal Opinion

Smokler v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 31, 1951No. Civ. 18272PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Appeal by defendants from a judgment which decreed that certain provisions of the zoning ordinance of the city of Los Angeles (Ord. 90,500 as amended; Los Angeles Municipal Code, §§ 12-16.02), insofar as they operate to prohibit plaintiff from conducting the business of automobile wrecking, as therein defined, on specified parcels of real property, is unreasonable, unconstitutional, and void. The judgment also enjoins defendants from interfering with plaintiff in conducting the automobile wrecking business on said property.

Plaintiff is the owner of several contiguous parcels of real…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alternatives for California Women, Inc. v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Callie v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Jordan v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Mikkelsen v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API