Legal Opinion

Mikkelsen v. Utah State Tax Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1969No. 11040PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs, for themselves and in behalf of all others similarly situated, brought a declaratory judgment action to have Chapter 154, Laws of Utah 1967,1 declared unconstitutional. The district court rendered an adverse judgment and plaintiffs appeal.

It was the contention of plaintiffs that Chapter 154, which related to the remittance or abatement of the property taxes of indigent persons, was violative of both the state and federal constitutions. They claimed that the act created an arbitrary and unreasonable classification by excluding both indigents who receive their principal source of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Southwest Engineering Co. v. ErnstArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Wilson v. State Highway CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Cooper v. Department of InstitutionsWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Hamman v. Clayton Municipal School District No. 1New Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Smokler v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Franklin Financial v. New Empire Development Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Richards v. BaumUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Richards v. BaumUtah Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API