Anderson v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtWilner, J.
There is substantial evidence that petitioner, Jesse Anderson, sold heroin to two undercover Baltimore City detectives. The question is whether, because of the way the State chose to proceed in the case, Anderson may be prosecuted for those offenses. The answer is “no.”
BACKGROUND
Anderson was the target of a sting operation conducted by Detectives Clasing, Barnes, and Butler. The operational scenario, as described by Detective Clasing, was to send one or more undercover detectives to purchase drugs from the target, to wait until those detectives, after purchasing the drugs, left the area, and…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. AdelWashington Supreme Court · 1998
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Marquardt v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Moore v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- State v. LongCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Malarkey v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Rudder v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.