Legal Opinion

California Canning Peach Growers v. Williams

California Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1938No. S. F. No. 15906PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This action was commenced by the California Canning Peach Growers against Frances 0. Williams and E. R. Williams (husband and wife) and A. D. Poggetto to recover from them $21,333.12 (reduced at the time of trial by stipulation to $21,226.66) alleged to be owing to the association by these parties. In addition the association seeks to recover liquidated damages for failure on the part of defendants to deliver to the association their 1935 crop from the Empire ranch. The complaint sets forth the entire theory of plaintiff’s cause of action in detail. Poggetto is sued as a silent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. California Canning Peach Growers v. DowneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. California Canning Peach Growers v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. California Canning Peach Growers v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. California Canning Peach Growers v. HarkeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. California Canning Peach Growers v. Bardell & OregoniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Salter v. UlrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. California State Employees' Ass'n v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. California Canning Peach Growers v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Henigson v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. California Canning Peach Growers v. HarkeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API