Legal Opinion
Shue v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 1, 1973No. 48447PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Judge.
The motion to suppress is based on the premise that Queen in locating the narcotics equipment was in fact acting as an agent of the police, who, not having obtained a search warrant, had no right themselves to enter and search the house; that the search was therefore illegal and the evidence inadmissible. This is an exceedingly close case. One who has leased a room to the exclusive possession of another (as a hotel clerk to a guest) has no right to consent for the guest to a search of the latter’s room. Stoner v. California, 376 U. S. 483 (84 SC 889, 11 LE2d 856). On the other…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stoner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Bacon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Teal v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
- Petersen v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Delaney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Kaspar v. City of HobbsDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.