Legal Opinion

Kaspar v. City of Hobbs

District Court, D. New Mexico

Decided March 28, 2000No. Civ 99-0262 JC/LFGPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CONWAY, Chief Judge.

THIS MATTER came on for consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Bifurcate Municipal and Supervisory Liability Claims from Personal Liability Claims for Trial, filed November 18, 1999 (Docs. 58, 59) (“ Motion to Bifurcate”), and Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment against Defendants Durham and Lamb, filed November 24, 1999 (Doc. 66) (“Plaintiffs Motion”). The Court has reviewed the motions, the memoranda and exhibits submitted by the parties, and the relevant authorities. The Court finds that Plaintiffs Motion is well taken in part and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Marshall v. Columbia Lea Regional HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. KimoanaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. Frederick Alonzo WallerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  4. Young v. Suffolk CountyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  5. United States v. CorralDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API