Legal Opinion

Petersen v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 23, 1997No. 96SC218PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Martinez

We granted certiorari in the ease of People v. Carl J. Petersen, No. 93CA0570 (ColoApp.Jan. 25, 1996) (not selected for official publication), to review the court of appeals’ determination that a caretaker of a property had either actual or apparent authority to consent to a search of that property by law enforcement officers.1 We reverse.

I

In August 1991, the El Paso County Sheriffs Department received a tip from a confidential informant that someone named Brian was growing large quantities of marijuana in a barn on rural property in Calhan, Colorado. Deputy Sheriff Scott Rosenbaum and Calhan…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Stoner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PORTER P.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  2. State v. LicariSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  3. People v. LehmkuhlColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. People v. MascarenasColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. United States v. Maurice Trotter, A.K.A. Mo Mardell Trotter, A.K.A. Juice, A.K.A. DelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API