Legal Opinion

Britt v. Hayes

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 6, 2001No. COA99-792-2PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Chief Judge.

This case presents the question of whether the plaintiff has an action for negligence.

The underlying case arose out of a confrontation on U.S. Highway 701 in Tabor City, North Carolina. Plaintiff alleges that he was traveling north on 701 when defendant “suddenly and without warning began backing up in the north bound lane colliding forcibly with the vehicle which the Plaintiff was driving and causing the injuries of which Plaintiff complains.” Plaintiff contends that by backing up, defendant acted negligently and caused damage to his person and property. Defendant filed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pleasant v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Jenkins v. North Carolina Department of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Siders v. GibbsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Ormond Ex Rel. Ormond v. CramptonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Lynn v. BurnetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Duvall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
  2. Byrd v. HopsonDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2003
  3. Crump v. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. Arch Specialty Insurance Company v. Travis HedrickCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  5. Arch Specialty Insurance v. HedrickCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API