Legal Opinion

Crump v. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 20, 2011No. COA10-1138PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEEfe, Judge.

Defendant North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (“NCDENR”) appeals from the Industrial Commission’s Decision and Order requiring NCDENR to pay $28,300.00 to David and Sharon Crump. NCDENR was ordered to pay this sum to the Crumps due to the negligent actions of Michael Beane, an environmental health specialist who intentionally certified incorrect soil depths and issued a wastewater system construction permit to the Crumps even though the property that Beane inspected was not suitable for any type of septic system. NCDENR primarily argues that the Crumps’…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bolkhir v. North Carolina State UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Guthrie v. North Carolina State Ports AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Pleasant v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Foster v. . HymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. Givens v. SellarsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cedarbrook Residential Ctr.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
  2. Cedarbrook Residential Ctr.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
  3. Cedarbrook Residential Ctr., Inc. v. N.C. Dep't of Health & Hum. Servs.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
  4. Cedarbrook Residential Ctr., Inc. v. N.C. Dep't of Health & Hum. Servs.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API