Legal Opinion

MacEdo v. Dello Russo

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 27, 2003PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

819 A.2d 5 (2003)

359 N.J. Super. 78

Joseph MACEDO, Rose Mary Lesky, and all other similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

Joseph DELLO RUSSO, Joseph Dello Russo, P.A. t/a New Jersey Eye Center, Medical Care, P.L.L.C. d/b/a Dello Russo Laser Vision, and William T. Kellogg, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 30, 2002.

Decided March 27, 2003.

Bruce H. Nagel argued the cause for appellants (Nagel Rice Dreifuss & Mazie, attorneys; Mr. Nagel and Adam M. Slater, of counsel and on the brief).

Robert W. Shaw, Mount Olive, argued the cause for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Printing Mart-Morristown v. Sharp Electronics Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  2. Cox v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  3. Lemelledo v. Beneficial Management Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  4. Neveroski v. BlairNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  5. Frahm v. UrkovichAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. MacEdo v. Dello RussoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  2. In Re Estate of GeyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Plemmons v. Blue Chip Ins. Services, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
  4. Shaw v. Santos (In Re Santos)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
  5. Kavry v. Herbalife International of AmericaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API