Legal Opinion

Northgate Partnership v. City of Sacramento

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 30, 1984No. Docket Nos. 21806, 21807PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CARR, J.

Appellants appeal from the judgments entered upon the granting by the trial court of respondents’ motions for summary judgment. Appellants sought a declaration that a real estate transfer tax imposed by respondent City of Sacramento was invalid, and requested a refund of taxes paid under protest. Appellants are the record owners of real property in the City of Sacramento (City). They had paid a total of $23,858.68 in real estate transfer taxes to City as of July 28, 1980.

The sole issue on appeal is whether the ordinance was a validly enacted emergency measure in force prior to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City and County of San Francisco v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. City of Glendale v. TrondsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. San Christina Investment Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Jarvis v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Oakland Raiders v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. San Francisco Fire Fighters Local 798 v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. City of Berkeley v. CukiermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Crown Motors v. City of ReddingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Sonoma County Organization of Public/Private Employees v. County of SonomaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Holtz v. MorelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API