Northgate Partnership v. City of Sacramento
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CARR, J.
Appellants appeal from the judgments entered upon the granting by the trial court of respondents’ motions for summary judgment. Appellants sought a declaration that a real estate transfer tax imposed by respondent City of Sacramento was invalid, and requested a refund of taxes paid under protest. Appellants are the record owners of real property in the City of Sacramento (City). They had paid a total of $23,858.68 in real estate transfer taxes to City as of July 28, 1980.
The sole issue on appeal is whether the ordinance was a validly enacted emergency measure in force prior to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City and County of San Francisco v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- City of Glendale v. TrondsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- San Christina Investment Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Jarvis v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Oakland Raiders v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- San Francisco Fire Fighters Local 798 v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- City of Berkeley v. CukiermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Crown Motors v. City of ReddingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Sonoma County Organization of Public/Private Employees v. County of SonomaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Holtz v. MorelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.