Legal Opinion

Eberhart v. Eyre-Shoemaker, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1922No. 11,100PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From Grant Circuit Court; J. F. Charles, Judge. Action by George E. Eberhart and another, partners, against Eyre-Shoemaker, Incorporated, and others, wherein one Ross intervened. From a judgment for defendants, the intervener appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

— This action was originally instituted in September, 1917, in the Huntington Circuit Court, by Eberhart and Kenner, partners, against appellee Eyre-Shoemaker, Incorporated, under the law of the State of Delaware and with its home office in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and T. L. Eyre, a resident of the State of Pennsylvania, and the Chicago and Erie Railroad Company upon an account and in attachment and garnishment, with necessary affidavit and undertaking filed and *660approved. A summons and writ of attachment was issued and served, and answer of the garnishee railroad company filed. Afterwards,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Doran v. CohenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  2. Goodwin v. Massachusetts Loan & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  3. Gass v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Lacy v. LoftonIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Merchants National Bank v. Delaware SchoolIndiana Supreme Court · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Owen County State Bank v. GuardIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Harvey v. RodgerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Beatty v. McClellanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949
  4. Matthews v. MatthewsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1930
  5. Fowler v. Barlow Et Ux.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API