Matthews v. Matthews
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.
There are three defendants in this equity suit. The first is father-in-law to the plaintiff, the second her husband, and the third the national bank, which is payee and holder of the joint and several negotiable promissory note of the other defendants.
Appeal is by the individual defendants. The decree appealed from commanded the payee to call for payment of the note; it further provided that in the event of default of payment, resort be had to securities owned, respectively, by the makers of the note, held by the payee as collaterals; property belonging to the plaintiff to apply to any unpaid…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bishop v. DaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1841
- West Huntsville Cotton M. Co. v. AlterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Eberhart v. Eyre-Shoemaker, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1922
- Robbins-Sanford Mercantile Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- Bearse v. LebowichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
3Cited by6 opinions
- MP ASSOCIATES v. LibertySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Depositors Trust Company, Etc. v. Alfred W. Slobusky, Michael ColodnyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Clark v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
- Schiska v. SchrammOregon Supreme Court · 1935
- Hunter v. Monroe County Lumber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.