Legal Opinion

Fowler v. Barlow Et Ux.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 8, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, J.

This is a petition in equity to foreclose a mortgage on real estate. The defendants have filed an answer in which they say that they were sureties or guarantors only, and that they are discharged from liability because there has been a material alteration of the note without their knowledge or consent; because the statute of limitations has run on the note and mortgage; and because Leray Fowler, one of the . makers of the note, died leaving an estate sufficient to pay the note in full, but the plaintiff made no attempt to collect the amount, and the estate has been disposed of.

A hearing was…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Cross v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. The Bank of Albion v. . BurnsNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Vogle v. RipperIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Bigelow v. StilphenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1863
  5. Richmond v. AikenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1853

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Howard Johnson, Inc., of Florida v. TuckerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
  2. Town of Brattleboro v. Carpenter Tr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  3. Manatee Loan & Mortgage Co. v. Manley's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
  4. Johnson v. Estate of SamsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1943
  5. Schiska v. SchrammOregon Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API