Ehlert v. State

— Appellant was tried and convicted in the court below upon an indictment charging him with the sale of intoxicating liquors to a minor.

In this court the only error assigned is the overruling of a motion for a new trial.

Appellant’s counsel devote their brief to the discussion of three questions, which they claim are presented by that motion :

First. That the evidence does not establish the fact that the person to whom the liquor was sold is the same person named in the indictment, nor that he was a minor at the time the liquor was sold to him.

Second. The exclusion, as evidence, of the marriage…