Delhaney v. State

Appellant was convicted upon a charge of burglary. His counsel contend that there is error in the record, in this:

1. That the conviction and judgment arc not sustained by sufficient evidence;

2. That the court below erred in admitting certain evidence ; and,

3. That the court below erred in refusing an instruction asked in behalf of appellant.

Counsel for the State meet the argument of counsel for appellant by contending, in the first place, that the record presents nothing for decision by this court.

What counsel for appellant claim is the record, is before us in two separate and detached…