Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Rapp

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1989No. 13704PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

PADGETT, J.

The Disciplinary Board of the Hawaii Supreme Court (Board), pursuant to Rule 2.7(c), Rules of the Supreme Court of Hawaii (RSCH), reported this matter, and recommended the suspension of the respondent, Stephen P. Rapp (respondent), from the practice of law for a period of three years. The Board’s recommendation was made after a review of the findings of fact and conclusions of law and recommendation of the hearing committee (committee), which made its report to the Board pursuant to the provisions of RSCH 2.7(b).

The Board adopted all of the findings and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Board of the Hawaii Supreme Court v. KimHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KagawaHawaii Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. KotisHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Iddings v. Mee-LeeHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Tauese v. State, Department of Labor & Industrial RelationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. LauHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BreinerHawaii Supreme Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API