Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. The Nissan Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan II

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided July 6, 2021No. 3:20-cv-00752Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION BRIAN SULLIVAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) NO. 3:20-cv-00752 v. ) JUDGE RICHARDSON ) THE NISSAN SUPPLEMENTAL ) EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN II ) and NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies. (Doc. No. 21, the “Motion”). Plaintiff has responded. (Doc. No. 28). Defendants have replied. (Doc. No. 34). The motion is ripe for review. For the reasons discussed herein, the Motion will be…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Bassett v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. Fritz v. Charter Township of Com-StockCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API