Legal Opinion
Balcoff v. Teagarden
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 18, 1940PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNOX, District Judge.
Teagarden, one of the defendants herein, asks leave to serve and file a third party summons and complaint, pursuant to Rule 14(a), of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.
The action is for copyright infringment, based on an alleged unauthorized performance by Teagarden of a certain song, at the request of plaintiff’s sister, one Meredith Blake, who represented to him at the time that she was authorized by plaintiff to make this request. Defendant wishes to bring Miss Blake into the action upon the theory that if he should be held liable…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Crim v. Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1939
- United States Ex Rel. Foster Wheeler Corp. v. American Surety Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1938
- Dewey & Almy Chemical Co. v. Johnson, Drake & Piper, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1939
- Saunders v. GoldsteinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1939
3Cited by12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Green v. KimberlinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
- Lee's Inc. v. Transcontinental Underwriters of Transcontinental Ins.District Court, D. Maryland · 1949
- Lane v. Celanese Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1950
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. McAuleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941
- Automotive Finance Co. v. DaigleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.