Legal Opinion

Saunders v. Goldstein

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 6, 1939No. 2958PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUHRING, Justice.

This is a motion by the third-party defendant to dismiss the original complaint and the third-party complaint.

The complaint alleges: “That on or about November 21, 1938. * * * defendant, Southern Dairies, Inc., * * * was engaged in * * * manufacturing and distributirig for public use and consumption ice-cream and confections including an ice-cream product known as ‘Drum Stick’ which consisted of a cake cone filled with ice-cream and represented as being covered with nuts * * * and offered the said product to the general public including the plaintiff through various stores…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crim v. Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1939
  2. Cushing v. RodmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
  3. Hanback v. Dutch Baker Boy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gray v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1940
  2. United States v. JollimoreDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1941
  3. Thompson v. CranstonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1942
  4. Balcoff v. TeagardenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
  5. Shannon v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1945

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API