Legal Opinion
Furash & Company v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 13, 2001No. 00-5084PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
Furash & Company appeals the decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims dismissing its contract suit against the United States for lack of jurisdiction. Furash & Co. v. United States, 46 Fed. Cl. 518 (2000). Because we conclude that the non-appropriated funds doctrine bars the Court of Federal Claims from exercising jurisdiction in this case, we affirm.
I
In 1997, Furash entered into a contract with the Federal Housing Finance Board (“Finance Board”). Under the contract, Furash was to provide consulting services directed toward assessing the value that federal…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- United States v. General Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- South Louisiana Grain Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Jimmie Ann Taylor, Ladell Vasicek, Noma Chriss, Martha Cole, and Sara M. McCarthy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Coalition for Government Procurement v. Federal Prison Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Lion Raisins, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Slattery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Alabama Power Co. v. United States Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.