Legal Opinion

Adolph v. Municipal Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 23, 1960No. Civ. 24614PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KINCAID, J. pro tem. *

Petitioners seek prohibition to restrain the Municipal Court of Los Angeles Judicial District from further proceedings in an action entitled John H. Pankratz v. William E. Adolph, and others, Number Van Nuys 575723. Petitioners heretofore filed a demurrer to the complaint in said action on the ground that there is a prior action pending in the superior court between the same parties for the same cause. The demurrer was overruled. Petitioners allege that the municipal court action will be brought to trial before their said superior court cause can be heard unless…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Lord v. GarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Greene v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Tomales Bay Oyster Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. National Automobile Insurance v. WinterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Culbertson v. CizekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. City Council v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Paykar Construction Inc. v. Spilat Construction Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API