Legal Opinion

Alioto v. United States

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided April 18, 1963No. Misc. 16PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRUBB, District Judge.

This is an independent proceeding under Rule 41(e), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Title 18 U.S.C.A., to secure the return of property seized under authority of a search warrant and for the suppression of the use of said property as evidence.

The movants are the seven corporations and one individual whose property was the object of the warrant; namely, Hotel Roosevelt, Inc.; The Pub, Inc.; Ben-Kay, Inc.; Tower Tavern, Inc.; Melody Lane, Inc.; Bonfire, Inc.; Badger State Boxing Club, Inc.; and Frank Peter Balistrieri; the custodian of the property at whose apartment…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. United States v. JeffersSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Trupiano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. James B. Cardwell, United States of America v. Marvin MartinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. United States v. HartsookUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
  3. People v. HendricksNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Balistrieri v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Balistrieri v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API